There is No Progress: It is Delusion

There is No Progress: It is Delusion

0 0
Read Time:5 Minute, 18 Second

 With a reference to progress, the New Time discarded Antiquity, the Middle Ages, theology, the traditions of Plato and Aristotle, the hierarchy, the Empire, the monarchy, the ancient foundations of the sacred peasant labor. 


Sooner or later, someone had to say it. The idea of ​​progress is pure delusion. Until we part with this prejudice, all our projects and plans, analyzes and historical reconstructions, all our scientific ideas will rest on a false foundation. It’s time to end progress. There is no linear progressive development of human societies.


Once we recognize this, everything will immediately and instantly fall into place. The idea of ​​progress was first formulated by encyclopedists in the 18th century, and it originates in the heretical theory of Joachim de Flora about the three kingdoms – the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit. Orthodox Christian tradition recognizes the era of the Old and New Testaments, that is, the era of the Father and the Son, but the end of Christian civilization is followed by a short period of apostasy, the coming of the Antichrist, and then the end of the world. And no special spiritual revival, no improvement of Christianity is expected. Against. 

When the era of the Son ends, humanity falls – degeneration, collapse, and degradation. Joachim de Flora and his followers, mostly Catholic Franciscans, on the contrary, considered the future to be wonderful, and after the fall of medieval Christian civilization, he prophesied the onset of something even more sublime and sacred. Encyclopedists no longer believed in the era of the Holy Spirit, as well as in the Church and in God himself. But the conviction at the end of Christian culture was shared and joyfully proclaimed the end of religion as the beginning of a new society — fairer, more perfect, more rational, and more democratic, more advanced.

The myth of progress was convincingly defeated by the outstanding Russian-American sociologist Petrim Sorokin.
But in the public consciousness – and even in the collective unconscious – he retained his dominant position. Regardless of everything, not a series of large-scale political catastrophes, not an obvious degeneration of modern culture, not a collapse of social systems, not the sinister discoveries of psychoanalysis, or an ironic criticism of Postmodernism, humanity blindly believes in progress. 


This is how atheists and materialists – Turgot, Condorcet, Diderot, Mercier – developed the theory of the universal progress of mankind, which was quickly elevated to the status of absolute dogma. People of the New Age were encouraged to doubt everything – God, man, mind, matter, society, hierarchy, philosophy, but to doubt progress … No, this is too much.


Why is this axiomatic? Why did the opinion of a number of thinkers – and not the brightest and most impressive – suddenly acquire the status of dogma? And why can’t one afford to criticize it, discuss it rationally, question it?
There is some kind of mystery in this. In modern times, progress cannot be categorically refuted. This is common to all political ideologies – liberalism, communism, and nationalism, to all scientific schools – idealistic or materialistic. Belief in progress has become a kind of religion. And religion does not require proof. The more absurd, the more reliable.

Modern civilization is rather in a state of deep decline. This is a bitter confession, but it is not the same as despair. If everything went wrong – and everything really went wrong – let’s return to fullness and health, restore everything as it was. Until it went bad. Moreover, the rejection of progress by no means prohibits the recognition of the improvement of certain aspects of life. But it just doesn’t make it binding law. 

So, with a reference to progress, the New Time discarded Antiquity, the Middle Ages, theology, the traditions of Plato and Aristotle, the hierarchy, the Empire, the monarchy, the ancient foundations of the sacred peasant labor. 
Of course, there was criticism of progress – both from the side of traditionalists and from some thinkers who adhered to the cyclical idea of ​​the logic of history, and in the school of European structuralists, and in the theories of new anthropologists.


The myth of progress was convincingly defeated by the outstanding Russian-American sociologist Petrim Sorokin.
But in the public consciousness – and even in the collective unconscious – he retained his dominant position. Regardless of everything, not a series of large-scale political catastrophes, not an obvious degeneration of modern culture, not a collapse of social systems, not the sinister discoveries of psychoanalysis, or an ironic criticism of Postmodernism, humanity blindly believes in progress. And thus continues to aggravate the situation.
But one has only to admit that it was a heresy, an unsubstantiated hypothesis, completely refuted by the very course of history, as the picture of the reality around us will return to focus.

Modern civilization is rather in a state of deep decline. This is a bitter confession, but it is not the same as despair. If everything went wrong – and everything really went wrong – let’s return to fullness and health, restore everything as it was. Until it went bad. Moreover, the rejection of progress by no means prohibits the recognition of the improvement of certain aspects of life. But it just doesn’t make it binding law. 

Something is improving. Something is getting worse. Moreover, one phase can replace another. And in different societies, these cycles – if they have any universal algorithm at all, may not coincide. Somewhere now there is progress, and somewhere regression. Summer in Russia, winter in Argentina. Without progress, we will restore both our sober rationality and our freedom. We can make the world a better place, but we can also make it worse. You have to think again every time. Compare, analyze, refer to history, rethink the legacy of the past – without any arrogance or prejudice.


So let’s make our being worthy. Certainly better than now. But in order to make at least one small step in this direction, it is necessary to ruthlessly discard the idea of ​​progress – this dangerous, corrupting perverted heresy.


Author

Alexander Dugin is a prominent Russian Philosopher and strategist.


Republishing is allowed with copyright credit to the Radical Outlook.

About Post Author

The Radical Outlook

The Radical Outlook is an online news web Portal designed for in-depth news analysis from the Eurasian region and beyond. It is Founded by a geopolitical analyst Shahzada Rahim.
Happy
Happy
0 %
Sad
Sad
0 %
Excited
Excited
0 %
Sleepy
Sleepy
0 %
Angry
Angry
0 %
Surprise
Surprise
0 %

Average Rating

5 Star
0%
4 Star
0%
3 Star
0%
2 Star
0%
1 Star
0%

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Optimized with PageSpeed Ninja